Hyperlawhypertext legal database People ex rel. Coyne v. Shea 76 N.Y.S. 1026

← Cases

People ex rel. Coyne v. Shea

76 N.Y.S. 1026 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1902-06-06 English

Delivered by McLAUGHLIN, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1026
PEOPLE ex rel. COYNE v. SHEA, Bridge Com’r, et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
June 6, 1902.)

Headnote

Mandamus by the people, on the relation of Thomas G. Coyne, against John L. Shea, as commissioner of bridges of the city of New York, and others. From an order denying a motion to resettle an order denying the writ, relator appeals. Affirmed. Joab H. Ban-ton, for appellant. Theodore COnnoly, for respondents.

The facts set out in this record, so far as they are material to the question presented, are the same as those set out in the record ou the appeal from the order denying a motion to resettle the order in the Melledy Case (People v. Shea, 76 N. Y. Supp. 679 ); and, for the reasons therein given, this motion was properly denied, and the order appealed from, therefore, must be affirmed. Order appealed from.affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.