Majority
p. 1127GARLOCK v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. January 14, 1902.)
Headnote
Action by Emogene Garlock, as administratrix, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied, with $10 costs, upon the authority of Sciolina v. Preserving Co., 151 N. Y. 50 , 45 N. E. 371 , and Meeker v. Remington & Sons Co. (opinion by O’Brien, J., court of appeals; not published).
Cases cited
- Sciolina v. Erie Preserving Co. 151 N. Y. 50 p. 1127