Hyperlawhypertext legal database Remsen v. Hyams 78 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Remsen v. Hyams

78 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1902-11-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
REMSEN et al., Respondents, v. HYAMS, Appellant.
(Supreme Court. Appellate Division, First Department.
November 7, 1902.)

Headnote

Action by Jane Remsen and another against Rosalie Hyams, individually and as executrix of the last will of Joel E. Hyams, deceased. From an ’order vacating and setting aside certain findings, and a judgment entered thereon in favor of plaintiffs, and permitting plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Charles W. Coleman, for appellant. William R. Wilder, for respondents.

We think that the case of Hahl v. Sugo, 169 N. Y. 116 , 62 N. E. 135 , is an express authority for the granting of this motion. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.