Hyperlawhypertext legal database Beattie v. Schenectady Railway Co. 79 N.Y.S. 1126

← Cases

Beattie v. Schenectady Railway Co.

79 N.Y.S. 1126 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1902-12-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1126
BEATTIE, Appellant, v. SCHENECTADY RY. CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
December 12, 1902.)

Headnote

Action by Isabella Beattie against the Schenectady Railway Company.

Order ( 77 N. Y. Supp. 889 ) reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with $10 costs. Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: “And that they be further enjoined and restrained, until the further order of the court, from interfering with the removal of the railroad poles and wires and the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein,”—upon opinion in Paige v. Railway Co. (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 266 .

KELLOGG, J., dissenting.