Hyperlawhypertext legal database Dingley v. Bon 8 N.Y.S. 935

← Cases

Dingley v. Bon

8 N.Y.S. 935 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1890-02-12 English

Delivered by Dykman, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 935
Dingley, Appellant, v. Bon, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
February 12, 1890.)

Headnote

Appeal from special term, Kings county.
Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.
J. C. & H. C. Smith & Koepke, (Herman P. Koepke, of counsel,) for appellant. Johnson & Lamb, (A. E. Lamb, of counsel,) for respondent.

We think the judgment from which this appeal is taken should be affirmed. The action is for the specific performance of a hontract for the sale of real property, and the trial judge has found facts which make the title plainly doubtful and unmerchantable, and his findings are all well sustained. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.