Hyperlawhypertext legal database Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York 83 N.Y.S. 1102

← Cases

Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. City of New York

83 N.Y.S. 1102 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1903-07-07 English

Delivered by INGRAHAM, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1102
BARBER ASPHALT PAV. CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 7, 1903.)

Headnote

Action by the Barber Asphalt Paving Company against the city of New York and another. From an order granting an injunction before final judgment, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Theodore Connoly, for appellants. L. Laflin Kellogg, for respondent.

There is presented upon this appeal the same question that was presented in the case of William G. Rose v. Seth Low, as Mayor, et al. (decided herewith) 83 N. Y. Supp. 598 ; and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.