Hyperlawhypertext legal database Murray v. Miller 83 N.Y.S. 1111

← Cases

Murray v. Miller

83 N.Y.S. 1111 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1903-07-07 English

Delivered by INGRAHAM, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1111
MURRAY et al. v. MILLER et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 7, 1903.)

Headnote

Action by William Blurray and others against Walter T. Bliller and others. Submission of controversy on agreed case. Judgment for plaintiffs. Benjamin N. Cardozo, for plaintiffs. A. C. Brown, for defendants.

The question presented upon this appeal is the same as that presented in William Blurray v. Walter T. Miller (decided herewith) 83 N. Y. Supp. 591 ; and for the

p. 1112
reasons stated in the opinion in that case judgment is directed for the plaintiff as prayed for, with costs. All concur, HATCH, J., in result.