Hyperlawhypertext legal database Murphy v. Milliken 84 N.Y.S. 1136

← Cases

Murphy v. Milliken

84 N.Y.S. 1136 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1903-11-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1136
MURPHY, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
November 25, 1903.)

Headnote

Action by Patrick Murphy against Edward F. Milliken and Foster Milliken.

The statement in the opinion that there was no evidence that Finck signaled at all was too broad. But that statement is not necessary to support the conclusion, reached. It is enough that there was no definite or satisfactory evidence that Finck signaled prematurely. Motion for reargument denied.