Hyperlawhypertext legal database Path v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 84 N.Y.S. 1138

← Cases

Path v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

84 N.Y.S. 1138 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1903-11-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1138
PATH, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 18, 1903.)

Headnote

Action by John Path against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and the denial of a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
H. A. Robinson (F. Angelo Gaynor and Bayard H. Ames, of counsel), for appellant.
Bennett & Silverman, for respondent.

The verdict is attacked on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence. Upon a review of the whole case we can find no sufficient reason for disturbing it, especially as no motion was made for the direction of a verdict. The defendant’s exception to the admission of evidence does not present reversible error. Judgment and o.rder affirmed, with costs.