Hyperlawhypertext legal database Robbins v. Bridgman 84 N.Y.S. 1143

← Cases

Robbins v. Bridgman

84 N.Y.S. 1143 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1903-11-18 English

Delivered by BLANCHARD, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1143
ROBBINS, Respondent, v. BRIDGMAN, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 18, 1903.)

Headnote

Action by Marcus Robbins against Malcolm L. Bridgman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Charles H. Luscomb, for appellant.
Maas & Goldberg, for respondent.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.