Majority
p. 737SCHALL v. CITY OF NEW YORK (two cases). (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. November 20, 1903.) Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, WOODWARD, JENKS, and HOOKER, JJ.
Headnote
Municipal Corporations—Defective Sidewalks—Slight Defects.A city is not liable for an injury from a depression in the sidewalk which had existed for several years, was near the curb, and was 4 feet long, 11 inches wide, and 3% inches deep.
¶ 1. See Municipal Corporations, vol. 36, Cent. Dig. § 1624.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Brooklyn, Third District.
Consolidated actions by Sarah Schall and Rudolph Schall against the city of New York. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, it appeals. Reversed.
George L. Rives, for appellant.
Altkrug & Kahn, for respondent.
These are actions against a municipal corporation for negligence in the care of a street. The woman complains that, while walking thereon in the daytime, she fell and was injured by falling or slipping into a depression in the sidewalk which was about 15 feet wide. The testimony for the plaintiff shows that the depression, which was near the curb, was 4 feet long, 11 inches wide, 3½ inches
p. 738
deep, and had existed for several years. I think that Hamilton v. City of Buffalo, 173 N. Y. 72 , 65 N. E. 944 , must control.
The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event. All concur.
Cases cited
- Hamilton v. City of Buffalo 173 N. Y. 72 p. 738