p. 1146SCHAPP, Respondent, v. BLOOMER et al., Appellants. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. January 19, 1904.)
Headnote
Action by Peter F. Schapp against Sherman Bloomer and another.Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
dissents upon the ground of error committed by plaintiff’s counsel in his statements to the jury respecting insurance against loss, and also upon the ground that the plaintiff assumed the risk.