← Cases

Borgio v. Gange

87 N.Y.S. 538 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1904-03-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 538
BORGIO v. GANGE.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 24, 1904.)

Headnote

1. Brokers—Sale of Real Estate—Written Authority—Commissions.
A real estate broker is not entitled to recover commissions for procuring customers for the purchase of real estate for defendant,, in the absence of proof of written authority from the owner to offer the property for sale.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth' District.
p. 539
Action by Alberto Brogio against Antonia Gange. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and SCOTT and BLANCHARD, JJ.
A. J. Oishei, for appellant.
J. J. Freschi, for respondent.

This action was brought to recover commissions to have been earned by plaintiff’s assignor procuring customers for the purchase of two houses owned by the defendant. As the plaintiff failed to prove that he had any written authority from the owner to offer the property for sale, he cannot recover. Peck v. Antes (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 252 .

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.