Hyperlawhypertext legal database Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co. 88 N.Y.S. 1117

← Cases

Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

88 N.Y.S. 1117 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1904-05-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1117
STRONE, Respondent, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
May 5, 1904.)

Headnote

Action by John P. Strone against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Bayard H. Ames and F. Angelo Gaynor, for appellant. Louis Steckler, for respondent.

Upon the evidence given by both parties the case was one for the jury, and in its submission no reversible error was committed by the court in its charge; the defendant having made no request for further instructions, or that additional questions should be specifically submitted. Nor are the damages excessive. Upon the record as it stands, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.