Hyperlawhypertext legal database Mayer v. Horenburger 88 N.Y.S. 966

← Cases

Mayer v. Horenburger

88 N.Y.S. 966 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1904-06-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 966
MAYER v. HORENBURGER.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 23, 1904.)

Headnote

1. Appeal—Review of Facts—Certificate.
On appeal to the Appellate Term from a judgment of the City Court, the facts cannot be reviewed where there is no certificate that the case contains all the evidence.
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.
Action by Henry Mayer, Jr., against Emma Horenburger. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and MacLEAN and SCOTT, JJ.
Arthur J. Westermayr, for appellant.
Kronfeld & Harris, for respondent.

There is no certificate that the case contains all the evidence. We cannot, therefore, review the facts. The exceptions to the admission and rejection of evidence present no question requiring a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.