Majority
Headnote
1. Trial—Postponement—Calendar Practice.The practice pursued by the attorney for the plaintiff in trying to postpone the trial is in direct opposition to the calendar rules of this county, which are printed on the calendar, and is indulged in altogether too much by members of the New York county bar. The affidavit submitted is that a witness is living in Buffalo, and has been for over a month, having moved there from Brooklyn; that an attempt was made to subpoena him at his former Brooklyn residence, when the fact of his removal was learned. It is not stated when this attempt was made, but I understand it was on or before last Friday (this being Monday), for the cause was on the day calendar that day.
This reveals gross negligence in preparing for trial. Also the affidavit of excuse comes toó late; it should have been presented when the cause was on the “reserve” section of the day calendar.
Our calendar practice is this; The calendar clerk from time.to time makes a general call of from 500 to 1,000 causes in their regular order, marking each cause ready where either side answers ready. This call is notice to the bar that the causes thus called are about to be reached for
Before a cause gets on the “ready” section of the day calendar, attorneys have had ample warning and time to get ready and to present their excuses, and if they fail to do so they violate the rules of the court, and such excuses come too late when the cause is on the “ready” section, and cannot be regarded. To regard such excuses on the “ready” calendar would be to break such calendar up daily. The Kings county bar have conformed to the practice, which is simple, and fair to all, with admirable results in keeping the courts busy, and doing away with the law’s delay, and the consequent compelling of the ready side to dance attendance from day to day because of the sloth and disregard of the rules by the other side. The ready side is entitled to protection, and even to favor.
The motion to postpone is denied.