Hyperlawhypertext legal database Diemel v. Scheveland 9 N.Y.S. 955

← Cases

Diemel v. Scheveland

9 N.Y.S. 955 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1890-04-07 English

Delivered by Larremore, C. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 955
Diemel et al., Respondents, v. Scheveland, Appellant.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
April 7, 1890.)

Headnote

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals. See ante, 482.
George Wilcox, for appellant. S. W olf, for respondents.

After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.