Hyperlawhypertext legal database Brown v. Ney 9 N.Y.S. 959

← Cases

Brown v. Ney

9 N.Y.S. 959 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1890-05-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 959
Brown, Appellant, v. Ney et al., Respondents.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
May 5, 1890.)

Headnote

Appeal from,trial term.
Action by Samuel G-. Brown and Emil Ney and Theresa Stiefel to recover $3,500, as damages for the defendants’ breach of their contract, by which they agreed to hire him as traveling salesman.
Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and Freedman, J.
Morris S. Wise, for appellant. Charles Strauss, for respondents.

None of the exceptions taken by the plaintiff appears to be tenable. The issues were fully and fairly submitted to the jury under a charge to which no exception was taken, and no reason appears for a disturbance of the verdict. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs on the opinion delivered by the trial judge on denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.