Majority
p. 1104LINICK, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. October 21, 1904.)
Headnote
Action by Katharine Linick against the International Railway Company.Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that it was error to exclude the evidence offered by the defendant for the purpose of proving, in effect, that plaintiff’s husband and witness attempted to induce the witness McNamara to promote and aid plaintiff’s claim. Schultz v. Third Ave. R. Co., 89 N. Y. 242 : Nowack v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 166 N. Y. 433 , 60 N. E. 32 , 54 L. R. A. 592 , 82 Am. St. Rep. 691 ; Gumby v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 65 App. Div. 38 , 72 N. Y. Supp. 551 ; Lamb v. Lamb, 146 N. Y. 317 , 41 N.
Cases cited
- Schultz v. Third Avenue Railroad 89 N. Y. 242 p. 1104
- Nowack v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 166 N. Y. 433 p. 1104
- Gumby v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 65 App. Div. 38 at 72 p. 1104
- Lamb v. Lamb 146 N. Y. 317 p. 1104