Hyperlawhypertext legal database Breterman v. AdLer 92 N.Y.S. 1117

← Cases

Breterman v. AdLer

92 N.Y.S. 1117 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1905-03-21 English

Decision Majority — BLANCHARD, J. · Concurring — SCOTT, J.

Contents
p. 1117
BRETERMAN et al., Respondents, v. ADLER et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 21, 1905.)

Headnote

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Charles Breterman and another against Ettie Adler and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Reversed. Benjamin Reass, for appellants." Henry Kuntz, for respondents.

Upon the stipulation, entered into between the parties to this action, that this appeal should be disposed of upon the record in the appeal now before us in the case of Lederer v. Adler et al., 92 N. Y. Supp. 827 , the judgment and order are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

O’GORMAN, J., concurs.

I concur, for the reasons stated in Lederer v. Adler, 92 N. Y. Supp. 827 .