Hyperlawhypertext legal database Frankel v. Stockman 92 N.Y.S. 1124

← Cases

Frankel v. Stockman

92 N.Y.S. 1124 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1905-03-21 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1124
FRANKEL, Respondent, v. STOCKMAN et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 21, 1905.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District. .Action by Isador Frankel against Samuel Stockman arid another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed. Ignace Irving Apfel, for appellants. Charles Frankel, for respondent.

The evidence fails to show either an actual or an implied agreement on the part of defendants to pay plaintiff for services rendered to Schwartz. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.