Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re Smith 93 N.Y.S. 1147

← Cases

In re Smith

93 N.Y.S. 1147 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1905-04-07 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — VAN BRUNT, P. J. (dissenting).

Contents
p. 1147
In re SMITH et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April 7, 1905.)

Headnote

In the matter of Morton B. Smith and others.
P. O. Schnitzler, for appellant.
J. B. Roe, for respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

As suitors in this country are not permitted to have commissions executed in Germany, except under the most onerous terms and conditions, it seems to me that, until the ordinary courtesies of civilized nations are extended to our courts by the German authorities, such applications as this should be denied.