Majority
p. 1149HERTZ, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. June 9, 1905.)
Headnote
Action by Lillian J. Hertz against the Manhattan Railway Company.Judgment modified, by striking out the provision for an extra allowance, for want of power in the court at Trial Term to grant the same, and judgment as modified and order unanimously affirmed, without costs.