Hyperlawhypertext legal database Schenkel v. Lischinsky 94 N.Y.S. 1162

← Cases

Schenkel v. Lischinsky

94 N.Y.S. 1162 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1905-06-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1162
SCHENKEL, Appellant, v. LISCHINSKY, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 22, 1905.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Jacob Schenkel against Ilochem Lischinsky. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Schleimer & Schleimer, for appellant.
Samuel Hellinger, for respondent.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530 ; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.