Hyperlawhypertext legal database Seeley v. Connors 95 N.Y.S. 1160

← Cases

Seeley v. Connors

95 N.Y.S. 1160 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1905-11-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1160
SEELEY, Appellant, v. CONNORS et al. Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
November 24, 1905.)

Headnote

Action by James J. Seeley against James J. Connors and Matilda Ostrum.

As the order appealed from herein merely stays proceedings until after the determination of the appeal taken in the proceedings supplementary to execution herein, and as that appeal has now been determined, the proper course seems to be to dismiss this appeal, without costs, without determining the question of the authority of the court to stay the proceeding.