Wood v. Stuart

95 N.Y.S. 1166 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1905-10-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1166

WOOD, Respondent, v. STUART, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1905.)

Headnote

Action by George R. Wood against Edmund A. Stuart.

We do not think the statement of items contained in the plaintiff’s bill of particulars constitutes an account of such a character as to justify a compulsory order of reference in this case. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.