Hyperlawhypertext legal database Miller v. Forrest 96 N.Y.S. 1136

← Cases

Miller v. Forrest

96 N.Y.S. 1136 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1905-12-06 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — HISCOCK, J.,

Contents
p. 1136
MILLER, Respondent, v. FORREST, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
December 6, 1905.)

Headnote

Action by Theresa Miller, by guardian, against William Forrest.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

dissents upon the ground that it was errdr to refuse to charge, as requested by defendant’s counsel, that, in addition to the other elements referred to in the charge, plaintiff “must show that the dog was improperly confined ; that he was let loose negligently.”