Lane v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

97 N.Y.S. 1139 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1906-03-28 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — WILLIAMS, J.,

Contents

p. 1139

LANE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, ppellate Division, Fourth Department,

arch 28, 1906.)

Headnote

Action by Frank Lane ainst the New York Central & Hudson River tilroad Company.

Judgment and order aimed, with costs.

dissents, upon the ground at no negligence was shown on the part of the fendant, that plaintiff assumed the risk, and at the exceptions as to evidence and the arge of the court present reversible errors.