Hyperlawhypertext legal database Lischinsky v. Hellinger 97 N.Y.S. 1140

← Cases

Lischinsky v. Hellinger

97 N.Y.S. 1140 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1906-03-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1140
LISCHINSKY, Appellant, v. HELLINGER, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
March 9, 1906.)

Headnote

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Application of Louis Lischinsky against Samuel Hellinger. From an order denying a motion to compel defendant, as attorney, to pay over certain, moneys, applicant appeals.
Modified and affirmed.
Max Schleimer, for appellant.
Thomas J. O’Neill, for respondent.

To obviate any question as to the order herein being pleaded as a bar, it should be modified by adding a provision thereto that it is without prejudice to such further action by petitioner as he may be advised; and, as so modified, it should be affirmed, without costs.