Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hull v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. 98 N.Y.S. 1104

← Cases

Hull v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

98 N.Y.S. 1104 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1906-05-02 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — McLENNAN, P. J., and NASH, J.,

Contents

Majority

p. 1104
HULL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
May 2, 1906.)

Headnote

Action by S. Augusta Hull against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

dissent,

and vote for reversal on the ground, that the

Dissent

p. 1105
testimony of the defendant’s witnesses that the locomotive was subjected to frequent and thorough inspection by competent inspectors is uncontradicted and that there should have been a dismissal of the complaint upon this ground. Smith v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Company, 164 N. Y. 491 , 58 N. E. 655 : Biddiscomb v. Cameron, 35 App. Div. 561 , 55 N. Y. Supp. 127 , affirmed 161 N. Y. 637 , 57 N.

Cases cited