Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bell v. City Security Co. 99 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Bell v. City Security Co.

99 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1906-05-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
BELL et al. v. CITY SECURITY CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
May 4, 1906.)

Headnote

Action by Philip T. Bell and others against the City Security Company.

No opinion. Submission dismissed on the ground that the agreed statement of facts shows that the plaintiffs have no cause of action against the defendant for specific performance ; the purchase of the real estate having been made at a judicial sale in foreclosure, and the remedy for a failure to complete being by motion in the foreclosure action.