Hyperlawhypertext legal database Serowitz v. Zweifach 99 N.Y.S. 1149

← Cases

Serowitz v. Zweifach

99 N.Y.S. 1149 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1906-06-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1149
SEROWITZ, Respondent, v. ZWEIFACH et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 1, 1906.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan; First District. Action by Zimon Serowitz against Adolf Zweifach and another. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal.
Affirmed.
J. Wilkenfeld, for appellants.
E. A. Klein, for respondent.

The case was tried by the justice without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and against the defendants upon conflicting evidence, and the questions of fact were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The claim that the justice presiding at the trial was disqualified is without merit. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.