Majority
Headnote
1. Police—What sufficient ground for discharge.There is sufficient proof to establish the
charge made against the relator. It is only partially denied. The proceedings were regularly, instituted. A charge was formally made and served upon the relator, and he had notice of the hearing before the commissioners, and duly attended, and was himself sworn in Iris own defense. The only question, therefore, for this court to determine is whether the charge itself was one sufficient to call for the relator’s dismissal, if true.
The relator was a policeman of the city of Yonkers. He is proven to have falsely stated that one of his associates on the police force was guilty of a-grave, immoral act, and one. injurious not only to him, but as implicating an associate in guilt with him. The relator, in addition, tried to get the false statement published in a largely circulated newspaper. Such conduct is injurious to the public peace and welfare, and is unbecoming a police officer. By the falsehood the respect for the police is weakened and a lack of friendly
The removal of the relator by the commissioners is therefore affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Dykmak, J., concurs.