p. 599Second. I give to my wife all my household furniture, including the clothing of the family.
Third. I give unto my said wife during her life, should she remain unmarried, the use of all my property, real and personal, of every description, not hereinbefore bequeathed.
Fourth. Upon the death of my said wife or her re-marriage, whichever may first happen, I give all my said property, the use of which I have given to my wife during her life or widowhood, as aforesaid, to the three following named societies, to wit: To the American Home Missionary Society, the American Sunday School Union, established in the city of Philadelphia, and the American Tract Society, instituted in the city of New York, to.be equally divided between the said three societies. Should any of the property hereby devised to said three societies, upon the death or re-marriage of my said wife, consist of real estate, I direct my executor, herein named, to sell the same and divide the proceeds between the said three societies. I am the owner and proprietor of the secret of making and preparing a liniment known as “Dr. Barker’s Knickerbocker Vegetable Liniment.” The label used upon the bottles by which I sell the same I have obtained a copyright for. This secret and copyright I do not consider bequeathed by me by the above provisions of my will, and I hereby bequeath the said secret and the said copyright and all my right, title and interest to the making and vending of said liniment to my said wife during her life, she not to divulge the secret of making said liniment. And after her death I bequeath the said secret to my executor, together with said copyright, with the request that all profits that shall arise out of the making and vending of said liniment, after paying himself the expenses and a reasonable compensation for attending to the same, shall be divided between the three said societies, from time to time, as they may accrue.
I hereby declare that the provisions herein made in favor of my wife shall be deemed in lieu of her dower in any real estate I may leave at my death. And I hereby appoint the Rev. Edwin F. Hatfield sole executor of this my last will. And I hereby revoke all former wills by me made.
In witness whereof I have hereby set my hand and seal to this my last will, this fifth day of April, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-six.
[l. s.] AUGUSTINE BARKER.
Charles H. Otis, for pl’ff; Bergen & Dyhman, for def’t.
the death of the testator, one-half the estate vested absolutely in the heirs-at-law subject to the
p. 600life estate of the widow. The residuary bequest being invalid, there was no conversion of the whole estate into personalty.
The case of Chamberlain v. Taylor ( 105 N. Y., 185 ; 7 N. Y. State R., 517) is a controlling authority upon this question. It is true in that case there was an attempt to create a trust, but in this case, like that of Chamberlain v. Taylor, there was no necessity for presuming a conversion in order to carry out the lawful purposes of the will. One-half the property vested in the heirs, and they could take the real estate, free from the power of sale, as there is no direction that they should only receive money. No valid trust is created by this will, and no absolute general direction given to the executor to sell and distribute the proceeds. The will can be carried out without any sale.
The case of Kearney v. Missionary Society of St. Paul ( 10 Abb. N. C., 274 ) is not in point. In that case the whole purpose of the will was valid, and could not be carried out without a conversion of the real into personal property. A valid trust was created, which could not be executed without such conversion, and the case simply holds that the mere fact that a beneficiary (one entitled only to receive money) could not take the full amount bequeathed to it, did not defeat the general scheme of the will. We think under the case of Chamberlain v. Taylor (supra) the power of sale was invalid.
The defendant must, therefore, have judgment.
Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.