Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hall v. Armando 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017

← Cases

Hall v. Armando

16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1888-05-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1017
CHARLES H. HALL, Resp’t, v. ANDREW ARMANDO, App’lt.

Headnote

Counterclaim—When properly disregarded.
E Mehling, for resp’t; M. Bogersderfer, for app’lt.

The action in the fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counterclaim for work, labor and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counterclaim.

We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice, in the trial, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.