Majority
Headnote
1. Subbogate’s court—Pbactice in New Yobk county—Affidavit to sustain BEQUEST FOB PEE DIEM ALLOWANCE—WHAT IT SHOULD CONTAIN.Application by the attorney for the trustees-for the reconsideration of his claim for costs heretofore taxed.
The attorney for the trustees in the first intance presented presumably the facts by way of affidavit in such detail and with such particularity as our rules require in respect of service claimed by him for “otherwise preparing for trial.” Excessive labor was in this proceeding imposed upon me in arriving at a just allowance to the trustees’ attorneys, which would have been materially reduced if he had regarded the rule and given me such detailed information as I am entitled to for the purpose of exercising that discretion which the statute invests in me.
Upon personal ex parte application, by way of letter addressed to me, I permitted him to file a supplemental affidavit upon his inferential motion for a reconsideration by
In this proceeding the trustees’ attorney seemed to ignore -completely the rule which has been in existence since the first of January last, requiring some reasonably detailed statement of services for which per diem allowance is claimed. There is no evidence now presented that the "trustees’ attorney has, in proper regard for fair practice, served a copy of the supplemental affidavit to sustain his •claim upon his adversaries.
My former decision upon this claim cannot be modified. It may be that the allowance granted by me by way of costs is not sufficient to properly compensate the attorney. In that event he should look to his clients, the trustees, for such compensation, and, if proper, they may be allowed the same upon a judicial settlement of their account. Upon the papers first submitted, including two certificates of the referee certifying to the time spent by him on the reference, I made him the allowance authorized by law.
The attorney for the trustees, without having first obtained leave therefor, has intruded a supplemental certificate from the referee in which he now certifies that twenty-four days were occupied by him on the two references. This is an increase in the number of ten days, and may be justified by the facts, although his first certificate is sustained by the affidavit of one of the contestants.
The certificate of a referee is permitted by statute instead cf a sworn statement, because of his official relations to the court. It goes without saying that he should be very careful to give correct, accurate and truthful information. Without intending to impute to this referee any impropriety whatever, I am unable to understand how he should have made a mistake of ten days between his two certificates. Under the facts, as they have been made to appear in this proceeding, I decline to modify my previous decision in regard to his allowance.
Parties before the court sui juris may, by written consent filed or by consent recorded upon the minutes before the referee, give him the right to fees in excess of those allowed by law, subject always to the approval of the surrogate.
The referee admits that he has reckoned his services at "the rate of ten dollars a day. The statute is too plain for •doubt that he cannot be allowed more that six dollars a day. It is impossible that he is not well acquainted with tms mandatory law. So also is the attorney for the trustees. Yet they unite in urging that I shall actually disregard the •statute. It is needless to say that I must decline to do so. "The referee claims a considerable item for his expenses in traveling from Hew England to Hew York to attend the
I hope all. referees and all attorneys will understand that I depend upon proof of substantial service rendered by each of them, and that I am controlled absolutely by the plain provisions of the statute in fixing the compensation therefor. I decline to indulge in judicial legislation.