← Cases

People ex rel. Central Park, North & East River Railroad v. Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments

21 N.Y. St. Rep. 357 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1889-01-28 English

Delivered by Daniels, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 357
The People ex rel. The Central Park and North and East River Railroad Company, App’lts, v. The Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Resp’ts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed January 28, 1889.)

Headnote

Taxes and assessments—Capital stock op corporation—Rule as to valuation.
The commissioners in 1886, retained the capital stock of the company at its par value, it being considered to be of the market value of one dollar forty-one, the balance adopted as the measure of the assessment being the sum of $1,473,753. The increase between this and the preceding assessment consisted in the further reductions made for the assessed value of the real estate, and the railway tracks and the road-bed of the company. Those assessments were deducted from the valuation placed upon the company’s stock. That was all which it could exact from the commissioners for this portion of its property. They also deducted the stocks owned by the company in other corporations, taxed on their capital. And that furnished the precise balance which the commissioners adopted and assessed upon the capital stock of the company. Held, that the facts sustained the commissioners in the action which they took.
. Appeal frorn an order confirming an assessment, and dismissing a writ of certiorari.
p. 358
Delos McCurdy and B. W. Franklin, for app’lts; Ceo. S. Coleman, for resp’ts.

The writ of certiorari in this case was issued to review the assessment of the relator’s capital stock, for taxation in the year 1886. It was still retained by the commissioners at its par value, although it was considered to be of the market .value of one dollar forty-one. The balance which was adopted as the measure of. the assessment was the sum of $1,473,753. The increase between this and the preceding assessment consisted in the further reductions made for the assessed value of the real estate, and the railway tracks and road-bed of the company.

Those assessments were deducted from the valuation placed upon the company’s capital stock. And that was all which it could exact from the commissioners for this portion of its property. They also deducted the stocks owned by the company in other corporations taxed, on their capital. And that furnished the precise balance which the commissioners adopted and considered to be the amount for which the company should be assessed, and was assessed, upon its capital stock. It still appeared by the report of the company made in April, 1886, that the same annual dividend of eight per cent continued to be paid upon its stock. And the fact was not denied, or explained, which was stated in its report in 1883, that the stock was of the value of 130 per cent.

The commissioners were sustained in the action which they took and the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and also disbursements.

Bartlett, J., concurs.