← Cases

Byrne v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

21 N.Y. St. Rep. 469 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1889-01-07 English

Delivered by Freedman, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 469
Michael Byrne, Resp’t, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Co., App’lt.
(New York Superior Court, General Term,
Filed January 7, 1889.)

Headnote

Streets—Ambulance entitled to right of wat—Laws of 1879, Chap. 186.
An ambulance is entitled to the right of way over other vehicles.
Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and from order denying defendant’s motion upon the minutes for a new trial.
Maclay & Forrest, attorneys, and Albert Stickney, of counsel, for app’lt, Isaac Fromme,- attorney, and Arthur O. Palmer, of counsel, for resp’t.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a collision between an ambulance driven by him and an ice wagon driven by a servant of the defendant. Upon the question of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence the case, upon all the facts and circumstances disclosed at the trial, was one for the consideration of the jury, especially as under chapter 186 of Laws 1879, the ambulance was entitled to the right of way as against the ice wagon, and the plaintiff, in a certain aspect of the

p. 470
case, had a right to assume that defendant’s driver would pay proper heed to the ringing of the ambulance bell and plaintiff’s shouting. The. questions of fact involved were fully and fairly submitted to the jury under a charge which placed the burden of proof upon the plaintiff and in all other respects carefully guarded all the rights of the defendant. Upon the whole case no error appears in the charge, or the refusals to charge, upon the question of damages, nor can it be held that the verdict is excessive.

The record disclosing no ground for reversal, the "udgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Ingraham, J., concur.