Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goodman v. Cohen 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 675

← Cases

Goodman v. Cohen

32 N.Y. St. Rep. 675 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1890-06-26 English

Delivered by Bischoff, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 675
Israel D. Goodman, Resp’t, v. Jacob Cohen,App’lt.[1]
(New York Common Pleas, General Term
Filed June 26, 1890.)

Headnote

Appeal — Reargtjment.
A reargument will not be granted where an examination of the case and opinion fails to show a misconception concerning the questions presented.
Appellant’s motion for reargument of appeal.
Benno Loewy, for motion; Merman Joseph, opposed.

A careful examination of the case on appeal and an inspection of the opinion delivered on the affirmation of the judgment herein failed to show any misconception concerning the questions presented. Therefore there does not appear to be any sufficient ground for a reargument

The legal questions presented, however, seem to be of sufficient importance within the meaning of rule 16 of the general term of this court, to entitle the appellant to go to the court of appeals. And a certificate to that effect should be granted him.

Larremore, Ch. J., concurs.