Majority
Headnote
Animals—1Trespass—Chabge.—Proof was given on the trial of this action tending to show that the bull at the time he injured the plaintiff was a trespasser upon the plaintiff’s lands. The plaintiff requested the court to charge “ that if the animal was trespassing upon the property of the plaintiff, and while thus trespassing did damage to the plaintiff thereon, whether he was a vicious animal, or known to be so by the defendant or not, the plaintiff is entitled to recover for the injury.” - The court declined so to charge. The ruling was erroneous. Van Leuven v. Lyke, 1 N. Y., 515 . The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide event.
Pratt, J., concurs ; .Dykman, J., not sitting.