Hyperlawhypertext legal database McSorley v. Prague 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 973

← Cases

McSorley v. Prague

43 N.Y. St. Rep. 973 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1892-01-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 973
Alexander McSorley, Resp’t, v. John G. Prague, App’lt.

Headnote

Appeal from judgment entered on the report of a referee.
Charles W. Dayton, for app’lt; Hatch & Warren, for resp’t.

We find no errors in the rulings of sufficient weight to warrant a reversal. The "testimony satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee, and justifies the judgment rendered.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the referee, the judgment is .affirmed, with costs.

Freedman, McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.