Hyperlawhypertext legal database Nordlinger v. Levine 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 52

← Cases

Nordlinger v. Levine

45 N.Y. St. Rep. 52 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1892-03-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 52
Henry Nordlinger, Resp’t, v. Morris Levine, App’lt.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed March 7, 1892.)

Headnote

Appeal—Reabgtjment.
A motion for reargument of an appeal in the common pleas will not be entertained unless presented, at farthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided.
Motion for reargument.
Goodhart & Phillips, for the motion; Guggenheimer & TJntermyer, opposed.

application is too late. By the settled practice of the court a motion for a reargument will not be entertained unless presented, at farthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided. Independently, however, •of this formal objection, the motion is without merit.

Eeargument denied, with costs.

Bookstaver, Bischoff and Pryor, JJ., concur.