← Cases

Strouse v. New York El. R. Co.

45 N.Y. St. Rep. 937 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1892-03-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 937
Joseph Strouse et al., Resp’ts, v. The New York El. R. Co. et al., App’lts.

Headnote

Appeal from judgment entered on the report of a referee.
B. Tolies, for app’lts; O. A. B. Pratt, Jr., for resp’ts.

We think the sums fixed by the referee as past damages and as the value of the plaintiffs’ easements are not excessive, and are supported by the evidence.

The other questions presented arise in consequence of exceptions to the admission and exclusion of testimony. We think that all of the questions have been passed upon by prior adjudications of this court in favor of the respondents and that no error was committed by the referee that requires us to reverse the judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.