Bleakley v. Sullivan — 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 962

Majority

p. 962

Rosalie A. Bleakley, Resp’t, v. Timothy J. Sullivan, Impl’d, App’lt.

Motion for re-argument. See 42 St. Rep., 814 .

C. W. Horton (Calvin Frost and Franklin Couch, of counsel), for motion; D. W. Travis, opposed.

The moving affidavits do not point out any statute-or controlling decision that has been overlooked.

We are still of the opinion that the judgment was properly affirmed.

Motion for re-argument denied; motion to be allowed to appeal to the court or" appeals denied. No costs of motion.

Barnard, P J., and Dykman, J., concur.