Pelly v. Naylor — 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 791

Majority

p. 791

Herbert Cecil Pelly, Resp’t, v. Francess Naylor et al., Ex’rs, App’lts.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,

Filed November 18, 1892.)

Headnote

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon verdict-directed by the court and from order denying motion for a new trial.

p. 792

Edward S. Clinch, for app’lts; Birdseye, Cloyd & Bayliss (Luden Birdseye, of counsel), for resp’t.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of the same plaintiff against Onderdonk, we are of the ■opinion that the judgment and order below should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Van Brunt, P. J., and O’Brien, J., concur in result.