Hyperlawhypertext legal database Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg Railroad 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940

← Cases

Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg Railroad

51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. Decision date 1893-03-02 English

Delivered by Herrick, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 940
The Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co., Resp’t, v. The Fitchburg Railroad Co., App’lt.

Headnote

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on verdict, and from order denying motion for a new trial.
T. F. Hamilton, for app'lt; Smith & Parmenter (R. A. Parmenter, of counsel), for resp’t.

This case presents the same facts as the case of Conrad Hoffman against the same defendant, 51 St. Rep., 345 , the plaintiff in this action being the employer of the plaintiff in that, both actions arise out of the same accident, and the conclusions arrived at in the Hoffman case require that the judgment herein should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Let an order be entered accordingly.