Smith v. Roblee

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 890 Court N.Y. Gen. Term English

Delivered by Mayham, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 890

Charles Smith et al., Resp’t, v. Hamilton A. Roblee et al., App’lts.

C. O. Lester & James W. Lester, for app’lts ; A. W. Sheperd, for resp’ts; Smith & Hickey; Jesse Stiles, for resp'ts Hammond et al.

On a careful examination of the facts and questions of law raised by the appellants in this case, I think that the judgment should be affirmed, and that a written opinion is not required. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.