Hyperlawhypertext legal database Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117

← Cases

Houghtaling v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1893-11-17 English

Delivered by *118 Van Brunt, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 117
David H. Houghtaling, Resp’t, v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company App’lt.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed November 17, 1893.)
Hawkins & Delafield {M D. Hawkins, of counsel), for app'lt; Cambers & Baughton, (W. P. Chambers, of counsel), for resp't

For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 57 St. Rep., 116 (decided herewith), the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.