Majority
Headnote
Costs—Term pees.The clerk properly allowed the item for term fees, it appearing that the cause was “ necessarily ” upon the calendar during the period in question, within the definition found in Sipperly v. Warner, 9 How. Pr. 332 , and the requirements of practice as to service of notice were complied with. See Gowing v. Levy, 43 St. Rep. 767 ; 17 N. Y. Supp. 771 . I find no reason for a departure from the rule, which obtains in this city, that term fees for terms during which a cause is upon the general calendar, awaiting trial in the usual course, may be taxed by the successful party. Code Civ. Proc., § 3251, subd. 3; Simpson v. Rowan, 13 Civ. Proc. R. 206; 11 Rum. Pr., p. 509. Motion denied.
Cases cited
- Sipperly v. Warner 9 How. Pr. 332 p. 107