Hyperlawhypertext legal database Nagel v. Adler 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 251

← Cases

Nagel v. Adler

63 N.Y. St. Rep. 251 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1894-11-20 English

Delivered by McCarthy, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 251
Harris Christian Nagel, Resp’t, v. Albert A. Adler et al App’lts.
(New York City Court, General Term,
Filed November 20, 1894.)

Headnote

Appeal—Conflicting evidence.
A verdict, on conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal.
Appeal from a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff.
Philipp J. Britt, for app’lts; Charles L. Subbell, for resp’t.

This trial involved a question of fact, which was fairly submitted under proper instructions. The jury having found on the facts against the defendants, and on conflicting evidence, we see no reason to disturb the same.

Judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

All concur.